How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Tab9WiFi vs Redmi Pad Pro

Blackview Tab9WiFi vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro

What Tab9WiFi does better (4) and where Redmi Pad Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Blackview Tab9WiFi
Blackview · 2024Tab9WiFi
6.0Score
4 advantages
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Xiaomi · 2024Redmi Pad Pro
7.1Score
13 advantages≈ $220
Higher score
5.0Display7.8
3.6Performance5.7
5.7Battery6.3
6.5Memory & storage6.1
5.4Features6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Tab9WiFiRedmi Pad Pro
161.8 × 246.89.1181.9 × 2807.5
Tab9WiFiRedmi Pad ProDifference
Height246.8 mm280 mm−33.2 mm
Width161.8 mm181.9 mm−20.1 mm
Thickness9.1 mm7.5 mm+1.6 mm
Weight540 g571 g−31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Tab9WiFi better than Redmi Pad Pro?

  1. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  2. Weight540 g vs 571 g+6%
  3. Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio87.9% vs 83.4%+5%

Why is Redmi Pad Pro better than Tab9WiFi?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  2. Wired charging10 W vs 33 W3.3×
  3. Battery capacity8,200 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+22%
  4. RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
  5. CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+50%
  6. Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
  7. Screen size11″ vs 12.1″+10%
  8. Pixel density206 ppi vs 249 ppi+21%
  9. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
  10. Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 1,600 px+33%
  11. Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,560 px+33%
  12. Thickness9.1 mm vs 7.5 mm+21%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight540 g571 g
Thickness9.1 mm7.5 mm
Height246.8 mm280 mm
Width161.8 mm181.9 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protection—IP52
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx2
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursInk Grey, Frost Blue, Blush PinkDark Gray, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size11″12.1″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)1,920 px2,560 px
Pixel density206 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—600 nits
Measured brightness—654 nits
Screen-to-body ratio87.9%83.4%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Chip makerUnisocQualcomm
Process12 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 710
AnTuTu score—589,889
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—2,840
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—786
Memory
RAM6 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity8,200 mAh10,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—9.6 h
Wired charging10 W33 W
Charged in 30 min—28%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5G—Yes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth55.2
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
NFCNoNo
GPSNoNo
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.1 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera8 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS
EU label
Energy classD—
Battery charge cycles800—
Endurance per cycle138 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare