How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
630 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. MegaPad vs MagicPad 4

Cubot MegaPad vs Honor MagicPad 4

What MegaPad does better (2) and where MagicPad 4 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cubot MegaPad
Cubot · 2026MegaPad
6.6Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
Honor MagicPad 4
Honor · 2026MagicPad 4
3 advantages≈ $630
5.9Display9.4

Why is MegaPad better than MagicPad 4?

  1. Cellular (LTE)Yes · MagicPad 4: No
  2. Screen size13.4″ vs 12.3″+9%

Why is MagicPad 4 better than MegaPad?

  1. Weight846 g vs 450 g+88%
  2. Pixel density169 ppi vs 290 ppi+72%
  3. Bluetooth5 vs 6+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight846 g450 g
Thickness8.1 mm—
Height309.3 mm5 mm
Width208 mm—
Ingress protection—IP40
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx0
ColoursGray—
Display
Screen size13.4″12.3″
PanelIPS LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px—
Resolution (long side)1,920 px—
Pixel density169 ppi290 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Peak brightness—2,400 nits
Screen-to-body ratio80.4%—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G81Qualcomm Snapdragon
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process12 nm—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency2 GHz—
GPUMali-G52 MC2—
Memory
RAM6 GB—
Storage (max)128 GB—
Storage (base)128 GB—
Memory card slotYes—
Battery
Battery capacity14,700 mAh—
Wired charging18 W—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
eSIMNo—
Dual SIMYes—
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5—
Bluetooth56
USBUSB Type-C 2.0—
USB version2—
NFCNo—
GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS—
Features
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
SensorsAccelerometer—
Cameras
Rear camera16 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Max video1080p—
Front camera8 MP—
4K front-camera videoNo—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16—
PlatformAndroid—
EU label
Energy class—G
Battery charge cycles—1,600
Endurance per cycle—90 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—E
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare