Why is Tab 50 better than T65 Max?
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · T65 Max: No
- Weight455 g vs 710 g+56%
- Pixel density224 ppi vs 175 ppi+28%
- Resolution (long side)2,000 px vs 1,920 px+4%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is T65 Max better than Tab 50?
- Battery capacity7,500 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+33%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Screen size10.4″ vs 13″+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 455 g | 710 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | — |
| Height | 246.4 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 161.5 mm | — |
| Colours | Gray | Space Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.4″ | 13″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,000 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 224 ppi | 175 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,500 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Front camera | 5 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
