How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Tab 50 vs Redmi Pad Pro

Cubot Tab 50 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro

What Tab 50 does better (5) and where Redmi Pad Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Cubot Tab 50
Cubot · 2024Tab 50
6.3Score
5 advantages
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Xiaomi · 2024Redmi Pad Pro
7.1Score
13 advantages≈ $220
Higher score
4.8Display7.8
6.2Performance5.7
4.4Battery6.3
7.6Memory & storage6.1
4.4Features6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Tab 50Redmi Pad Pro
161.5 × 246.47.7181.9 × 2807.5
Tab 50Redmi Pad ProDifference
Height246.4 mm280 mm−33.6 mm
Width161.5 mm181.9 mm−20.4 mm
Thickness7.7 mm7.5 mm+0.2 mm
Weight455 g571 g−116 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Tab 50 better than Redmi Pad Pro?

  1. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Redmi Pad Pro: No
  2. Weight455 g vs 571 g+25%
  3. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  4. GPSYes · Redmi Pad Pro: No
  5. Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%

Why is Redmi Pad Pro better than Tab 50?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  2. Battery capacity7,500 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+33%
  3. 5GNo · Tab 50: Yes
  4. Screen size10.4″ vs 12.1″+16%
  5. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Tab 50: Yes
  6. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
  7. Pixel density224 ppi vs 249 ppi+11%
  8. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
  9. Front camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
  10. Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 1,600 px+33%
  11. Resolution (long side)2,000 px vs 2,560 px+28%
  12. Screen-to-body ratio77.4% vs 83.4%+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight455 g571 g
Thickness7.7 mm7.5 mm
Height246.4 mm280 mm
Width161.5 mm181.9 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protection—IP52
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx2
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursGrayDark Gray, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size10.4″12.1″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)2,000 px2,560 px
Pixel density224 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—600 nits
Measured brightness—654 nits
Screen-to-body ratio77.4%83.4%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process—4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 710
AnTuTu score—589,889
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—2,840
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—786
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,500 mAh10,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—9.6 h
Wired charging—33 W
Charged in 30 min—28%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GNoYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS—
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.1 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, compassAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video—1080p
Front camera5 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare