Why is Tab A9+ better than Tab 80?
- Screen size11″ vs 8″+38%
- Energy classE vs F
- Drop resistance classC vs E
- Endurance per cycle92 h vs 60 h+54%
Why is Tab 80 better than Tab A9+?
- Weight644 g vs 610 g+6%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 644 g | 610 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | — |
| Height | 257.3 mm | 12 mm |
| Width | 168.8 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | — |
| Pixel density | 137 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.8% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7200 | Allwinner |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Allwinner |
| Process | 12 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,580 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 10 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | — |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| GPS | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Front camera | 5 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 92 h | 60 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | C | E |
