Why is Tab 80 better than T50?
Tab 80 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is T50 better than Tab 80?
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size8″ vs 11″+38%
- Endurance per cycle60 h vs 126 h2.1×
- Weight610 g vs 498 g+22%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Energy classF vs D
- Drop resistance classE vs B
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 610 g | 498 g |
| Height | 12 mm | 9 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 11″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Allwinner | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | F | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 60 h | 126 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | B |
