How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Tab E3+ vs Redmi Pad 2

Doogee Tab E3+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2

What Tab E3+ does better (3) and where Redmi Pad 2 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Doogee Tab E3+
Doogee · 2025Tab E3+
7.1Score
3 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
Xiaomi · 2025Redmi Pad 2
6.7Score
8 advantages≈ $250
6.5Display7.2
6.6Performance5.1
6.3Battery6.5
7.6Memory & storage6.1
4.8Features4.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Tab E3+Redmi Pad 2
174.3 × 278.87.7166 × 254.67.4
Tab E3+Redmi Pad 2Difference
Height278.8 mm254.6 mm+24.2 mm
Width174.3 mm166 mm+8.3 mm
Thickness7.7 mm7.4 mm+0.3 mm
Weight583 g510 g+73 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Tab E3+ better than Redmi Pad 2?

  1. Screen size12″ vs 11″+9%
  2. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  3. Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%

Why is Redmi Pad 2 better than Tab E3+?

  1. Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 9,000 mAh+2%
  2. Pixel density195 ppi vs 274 ppi+41%
  3. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Tab E3+: Yes
  4. Weight583 g vs 510 g+14%
  5. Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 1,600 px+33%
  6. Resolution (long side)2,000 px vs 2,560 px+28%
  7. Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
  8. Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.4 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Doogee Tab E3+Doogee Tab E3+≈ $2707.1
Design
Weight583 g510 g
Thickness7.7 mm7.4 mm
Height278.8 mm254.6 mm
Width174.3 mm166 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Aluminium
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3 or Panda glass
ColoursBlack, Gray, BlueGraphite Gray, Mint Green, Lavender Purple
Display
Screen size12″11″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)2,000 px2,560 px
Pixel density195 ppi274 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz90 Hz
Peak brightness—600 nits
Measured brightness—527 nits
Screen-to-body ratio83.9%83%
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G100Mediatek Helio G100 Ultra
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process6 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score—570,469
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—1,980
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity8,800 mAh9,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—11.2 h
Wired charging18 W18 W
Charged in 30 min—17%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesYes
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth55.3
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
NFCNoNo
GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometer, compassAccelerometer, gyro/compass (cellular model only)
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2.2f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera5 MP5 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy classF—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle93 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare