Why is U13 better than T60?
- Screen size13″ vs 12.2″+7%
- Battery charge cycles1,100 vs 800+38%
Why is T60 better than U13?
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Pixel density174 ppi vs 236 ppi+36%
- Endurance per cycle77 h vs 156 h2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx4
- Energy classG vs D
- Drop resistance classE vs B
- Weight670 g vs 640 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 670 g | 640 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | — |
| Height | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 197.2 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP20 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 12.2″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | — |
| Pixel density | 174 ppi | 236 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 350 nits | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 77 h | 156 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | B |
