Why is U13 better than T65 Max?
- Battery capacity11,000 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+10%
- Peak brightness350 nits vs 300 nits+17%
- Weight670 g vs 710 g+6%
Why is T65 Max better than U13?
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 670 g | 710 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | — |
| Height | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 197.2 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP20 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue | Space Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 13″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 174 ppi | 175 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 350 nits | 300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | MediaTek Helio |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 77 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | E | — |
