vs
9.4Display8.2
Why is MagicPad 4 better than Pad X9 Max?
- Peak brightness2,400 nits vs 700 nits3.4×
- Weight450 g vs 618 g+37%
- Pixel density290 ppi vs 228 ppi+27%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.1+18%
Why is Pad X9 Max better than MagicPad 4?
- Screen size12.3″ vs 13″+6%
- Energy classG vs E
- Endurance per cycle90 h vs 146 h+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 618 g |
| Thickness | — | 6.8 mm |
| Height | 5 mm | 7 mm |
| Width | — | 192.7 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP40 | IP40 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx0 |
| Colours | — | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.3″ | 13″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 1,560 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 2,500 px |
| Pixel density | 290 ppi | 228 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,400 nits | 700 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 85.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 10,100 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.1 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 16 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | MagicOS 10 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | E |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | 90 h | 146 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
