vs
9.4Display8.6
Why is MagicPad 4 better than MatePad 12X 2025?
- Peak brightness2,400 nits vs 1,000 nits2.4×
- Screen size12.3″ vs 12″+3%
- Weight450 g vs 555 g+23%
- Pixel density290 ppi vs 280 ppi+4%
- Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 1,000+60%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.2+15%
Why is MatePad 12X 2025 better than MagicPad 4?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx2
- Endurance per cycle90 h vs 94 h+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 555 g |
| Height | 5 mm | 6 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP40 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx2 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.3″ | 12″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Pixel density | 290 ppi | 280 ppi |
| Peak brightness | 2,400 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon | HiSilicon Kirin |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | HiSilicon |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 256 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 90 h | 94 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
