9.4Display8.1
Why is MagicPad 4 better than IdeaTab Pro G2?
- Peak brightness2,400 nits vs 600 nits4×
- Weight450 g vs 598 g+33%
- Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 1,000+60%
Why is IdeaTab Pro G2 better than MagicPad 4?
- Screen size12.3″ vs 13″+6%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx2
- Repairability classC vs A
- Endurance per cycle90 h vs 105 h+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 598 g |
| Height | 5 mm | 8 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP40 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx2 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.3″ | 13″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Pixel density | 290 ppi | — |
| Peak brightness | 2,400 nits | 600 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon | MediaTek |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 90 h | 105 h |
| Repairability class | C | A |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
