9.4Display7.4
Why is MagicPad 4 better than Astra 2 Gaming?
- Peak brightness2,400 nits vs 1,100 nits2.2×
- Screen size12.3″ vs 9.1″+36%
- Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 1,000+60%
- Endurance per cycle90 h vs 70 h+29%
Why is Astra 2 Gaming better than MagicPad 4?
- Weight450 g vs 363 g+24%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx4
- Repairability classC vs A
- Pixel density290 ppi vs 313 ppi+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 363 g |
| Height | 5 mm | 7 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP40 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.3″ | 9.1″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Pixel density | 290 ppi | 313 ppi |
| Peak brightness | 2,400 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 90 h | 70 h |
| Repairability class | C | A |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
