How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. MagicPad 4 vs Poco Pad C1

Honor MagicPad 4 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad C1

What MagicPad 4 does better (4) and where Poco Pad C1 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Honor MagicPad 4
Honor · 2026MagicPad 4
4 advantages≈ $630
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
Xiaomi · 2026Poco Pad C1
5.5Score
1 advantage
Higher score
9.4Display6.9

Why is MagicPad 4 better than Poco Pad C1?

  1. Peak brightness2,400 nits vs 600 nits4×
  2. Screen size12.3″ vs 9.7″+27%
  3. Pixel density290 ppi vs 268 ppi+8%
  4. Bluetooth6 vs 5+20%

Why is Poco Pad C1 better than MagicPad 4?

  1. Weight450 g vs 406 g+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight450 g406 g
Thickness—7.4 mm
Height5 mm226.5 mm
Width—148 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protectionIP40—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx0—
Colours—Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size12.3″9.7″
Panel—IPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)—1,280 px
Resolution (long side)—2,048 px
Pixel density290 ppi268 ppi
Refresh rate—120 Hz
Peak brightness2,400 nits600 nits
Screen-to-body ratio—87.9%
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process—6 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—2.9 GHz
GPU—Adreno 610
AnTuTu score—511,632
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—1,558
Memory
RAM—6 GB
Storage (max)—128 GB
Storage (base)—64 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slot—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity—7,600 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Wired charging—18 W
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5G—No
eSIM—No
Dual SIM—No
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth65
USB—USB Type-C
USB version—2
NFC—No
GPS—No
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera—8 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Max video—1080p
Front camera—5 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launch—Android 16
Platform—Android
Interface—HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy classG—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle90 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare