Why is MagicPad 4 better than ET401 8?
- Screen size12.3″ vs 8″+54%
- Weight450 g vs 480 g+7%
Why is ET401 8 better than MagicPad 4?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx8
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 450 g | 480 g |
| Height | 5 mm | 11 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP40 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.3″ | 8″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Pixel density | 290 ppi | — |
| Peak brightness | 2,400 nits | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon | Qualcomm Dragonwing |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 64 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 90 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | E | — |
