vs
8.2Display8.6
4.1Memory & storage8.8
Why is Pad X9 Max better than MatePad 12X 2025?
- Screen size13″ vs 12″+8%
- Energy classE vs G
- Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 1,000+60%
- Endurance per cycle146 h vs 94 h+55%
Why is MatePad 12X 2025 better than Pad X9 Max?
- RAM4 GB vs 12 GB3×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 1,000 nits+43%
- Pixel density228 ppi vs 280 ppi+23%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx2
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight618 g vs 555 g+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 618 g | 555 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | — |
| Height | 7 mm | 6 mm |
| Width | 192.7 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP40 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 12″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,560 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,500 px | — |
| Pixel density | 228 ppi | 280 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon | HiSilicon Kirin |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | HiSilicon |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 146 h | 94 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
