vs
8.2Display6.7
4.1Memory & storage8.0
Why is Pad X9 Max better than T60 Pro?
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 350 nits2×
- Weight618 g vs 748 g+21%
- Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 8002×
Why is T60 Pro better than Pad X9 Max?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size13″ vs 13.4″+3%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx4
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Energy classE vs D
- Repairability classC vs B
- Drop resistance classE vs B
- Endurance per cycle146 h vs 166 h+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 618 g | 748 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | — |
| Height | 7 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 192.7 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP40 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 13.4″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,560 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,500 px | — |
| Pixel density | 228 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 146 h | 166 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | B |
