vs
8.2Display6.3
4.1Memory & storage4.4
Why is Pad X9 Max better than MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2?
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 220 nits3.2×
- Weight618 g vs 1,300 g2.1×
- Energy classE vs G
- Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 8002×
- Endurance per cycle146 h vs 95 h+54%
Why is MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2 better than Pad X9 Max?
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Screen size13″ vs 13.3″+2%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx4
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 618 g | 1,300 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | — |
| Height | 7 mm | 13 mm |
| Width | 192.7 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP40 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Gray | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13″ | 13.3″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,560 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,500 px | — |
| Pixel density | 228 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 220 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon | ARM Cortex |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | ARM |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | G |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 146 h | 95 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
