How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad X9 vs Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra

Honor Pad X9 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra

What Pad X9 does better (1) and where Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra wins (28) — every spec side by side.

Honor Pad X9
Honor · 2023Pad X9
5.4Score
1 advantage≈ $270
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
9.5Score
28 advantages≈ $1,750
Higher score
6.3Display9.3
4.2Performance9.0
6.1Battery8.5
3.6Memory & storage9.7
3.1Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pad X9Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
167.4 × 267.36.9208.6 × 326.45.4
Pad X9Galaxy Tab S10 UltraDifference
Height267.3 mm326.4 mm−59.1 mm
Width167.4 mm208.6 mm−41.2 mm
Thickness6.9 mm5.4 mm+1.5 mm
Weight495 g718 g−223 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pad X9 better than Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra?

  1. Weight495 g vs 718 g+45%

Why is Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra better than Pad X9?

  1. AnTuTu score461,236 vs 2,347,1165.1×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,551 vs 7,1254.6×
  3. RAM4 GB vs 16 GB4×
  4. Battery capacity7,250 mAh vs 11,200 mAh+54%
  5. Storage (max)128 GB vs 1,024 GB8×
  6. Peak brightness450 nits vs 930 nits2.1×
  7. OLED panelNo · Pad X9: Yes
  8. Wired charging22 W vs 45 W2×
  9. 5GNo · Pad X9: Yes
  10. Screen size11.5″ vs 14.6″+27%
  11. Rear camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
  12. Front camera5 MP vs 12 MP2.4×
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Pad X9Honor Pad X9≈ $2705.4
Design
Weight495 g718 g
Thickness6.9 mm5.4 mm
Height267.3 mm326.4 mm
Width167.4 mm208.6 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
Ingress protection—IP68
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursSpace GrayMoonstone Gray, Platinum Silver
Display
Screen size11.5″14.6″
PanelTFT LCDDynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panelNoYes
Resolution (short side)1,200 px1,848 px
Resolution (long side)2,000 px2,960 px
Pixel density203 ppi239 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness450 nits930 nits
Measured brightness452 nits603 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%90.7%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685Mediatek Dimensity 9300+
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz3.4 GHz
GPUAdreno 610Immortalis-G720 MC12
AnTuTu score461,2362,347,116
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,5517,125
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,298
Memory
RAM4 GB16 GB
Storage (max)128 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,250 mAh11,200 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)13.3 h—
Wired charging22 W45 W
Charged in 30 min34%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesYes
5GNoYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15.3
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)—Yes
NFCNoNo
GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-23.5 LUFS—
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensor—Under display
SensorsAccelerometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera5 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2.2f/2
Rear cameras12
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p4K
4K video frame rate—30 fps
Front camera5 MP12 MP
4K front-camera videoNoYes
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 7.1One UI 6.1
EU label
Energy class—G
Battery charge cycles—2,000
Endurance per cycle—85 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—E
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare