How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Pad X9 vs Armor Pad

Honor Pad X9 vs UleFone Armor Pad

What Pad X9 does better (12) and where Armor Pad wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Honor Pad X9
Honor · 2023Pad X9
5.4Score
12 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
UleFone Armor Pad
UleFone · 2023Armor Pad
4.8Score
4 advantages≈ $220
6.3Display2.4
4.2Performance3.8
6.1Battery4.6
3.6Memory & storage3.1
3.1Features5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pad X9Armor Pad
167.4 × 267.36.9128.8 × 21314
Pad X9Armor PadDifference
Height267.3 mm213 mm+54.3 mm
Width167.4 mm128.8 mm+38.6 mm
Thickness6.9 mm14 mm−7.1 mm
Weight495 g560 g−65 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pad X9 better than Armor Pad?

  1. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
  2. Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
  3. Screen size11.5″ vs 8″+44%
  4. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz+40%
  5. Thickness6.9 mm vs 14 mm2×
  6. Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
  7. Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
  8. Weight495 g vs 560 g+13%
  9. Pixel density203 ppi vs 189 ppi+7%
  10. Resolution (long side)2,000 px vs 1,280 px+56%
  11. Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
  12. Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 67.6%+24%

Why is Armor Pad better than Pad X9?

  1. Battery capacity7,250 mAh vs 7,650 mAh+6%
  2. Rear camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
  3. Memory card slotNo · Pad X9: Yes
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pad X9: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Pad X9Honor Pad X9≈ $2705.4
Design
Weight495 g560 g
Thickness6.9 mm14 mm
Height267.3 mm213 mm
Width167.4 mm128.8 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackAluminium—
Ingress protection—IP68
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
ColoursSpace GrayBlack
Display
Screen size11.5″8″
PanelTFT LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px800 px
Resolution (long side)2,000 px1,280 px
Pixel density203 ppi189 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness450 nits—
Measured brightness452 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%67.6%
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685Mediatek MT6762 Helio G25
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process6 nm12 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz2 GHz
GPUAdreno 610PowerVR GE8320
AnTuTu score461,236—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,551—
Memory
RAM4 GB4 GB
Storage (max)128 GB64 GB
Storage (base)128 GB64 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,250 mAh7,650 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)13.3 h—
Wired charging22 W—
Charged in 30 min34%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesYes
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.15.2
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
NFCNoNo
GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-23.5 LUFS—
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Fingerprint sensor—Side / power button
SensorsAccelerometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera5 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2.2f/2.2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera5 MP5 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 12
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 7.1—
EU label
Energy class—F
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—84 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare