Dimensions
Size comparison
Pad X9Redmi Pad
| Pad X9 | Redmi Pad | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 267.3 mm | 250.5 mm | +16.8 mm |
| Width | 167.4 mm | 158.1 mm | +9.3 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.1 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 495 g | 465 g | +30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pad X9 better than Redmi Pad?
- AnTuTu score461,236 vs 319,077+45%
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Redmi Pad: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Screen size11.5″ vs 10.6″+8%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+27%
- Wired charging22 W vs 18 W+25%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- GPSYes · Redmi Pad: No
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 400 nits+12%
- Measured brightness452 nits vs 402 nits+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 80.9%+4%
- Thickness6.9 mm vs 7.1 mm+3%
Why is Redmi Pad better than Pad X9?
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Battery capacity7,250 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+10%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,551 vs 1,852+19%
- Memory card slotNo · Pad X9: Yes
- Pixel density203 ppi vs 220 ppi+8%
- Weight495 g vs 465 g+6%
- Rear camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Front camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 495 g | 465 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.1 mm |
| Height | 267.3 mm | 250.5 mm |
| Width | 167.4 mm | 158.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Space Gray | Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.5″ | 10.6″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,000 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 203 ppi | 220 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 452 nits | 402 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 80.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 461,236 | 319,077 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,551 | 1,852 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,250 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 13.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 34% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.5 LUFS | -23.9 LUFS |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.1 | MIUI 14 |
