vs
6.0Display6.8
Why is R9 Ultra better than IdeaTab Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- Endurance per cycle259 h vs 112 h2.3×
- Drop resistance classA vs E
Why is IdeaTab Pro better than R9 Ultra?
- Weight1,066 g vs 620 g+72%
- Screen size11″ vs 12.7″+15%
- Repairability classC vs A
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1,066 g | 620 g |
| Thickness | 17.8 mm | — |
| Height | 18 mm | 7 mm |
| Width | 182 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Black, Red | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 12.7″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | — |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 71.5% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | MediaTek |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 20,800 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 259 h | 112 h |
| Repairability class | C | A |
| Drop resistance class | A | E |
