zh.md
Compare
MatePad 11.5 (2025) vs Pad Go 2

Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) vs OnePlus Pad Go 2

What MatePad 11.5 (2025) does better (5) and where Pad Go 2 wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2025MatePad 11.5 (2025)

7.5Score

5 advantages≈ $310

OnePlus · 2025Pad Go 2

7.9Score

14 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

7.8Display8.5

7.6Battery8.3

5.6Memory & storage6.1

5.1Features6.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad 11.5 (2025)Pad Go 2

	MatePad 11.5 (2025)	Pad Go 2	Difference
Height	262.6 mm	266 mm	−3.4 mm
Width	177.5 mm	192.8 mm	−15.3 mm
Thickness	6.1 mm	6.8 mm	−0.7 mm
Weight	515 g	597 g	−82 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad 11.5 (2025) better than Pad Go 2?

Wired charging40 W vs 33 W+21%
Weight515 g vs 597 g+16%
Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 800+25%
Thickness6.1 mm vs 6.8 mm+11%

Why is Pad Go 2 better than MatePad 11.5 (2025)?

Cellular (LTE)No · MatePad 11.5 (2025): Yes
Peak brightness600 nits vs 900 nits+50%
Screen size11.5″ vs 12.1″+5%
Memory card slotNo · MatePad 11.5 (2025): Yes
GPSNo · MatePad 11.5 (2025): Yes
Energy classG vs F
Repairability classC vs B
Pixel density256 ppi vs 283 ppi+11%
CPU frequency2.29 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+9%
Endurance per cycle80 h vs 101 h+27%
Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 1,980 px+24%
Resolution (long side)2,456 px vs 2,800 px+14%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)≈ $3107.5	OnePlus Pad Go 2≈ $3807.9
Design
Weight	515 g	597 g
Thickness	6.1 mm	6.8 mm
Height	262.6 mm	266 mm
Width	177.5 mm	192.8 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	—	IP40
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx0
Colours	Violet, Space Gray	Shadow Black, Lavender Drift
Display
Screen size	11.5″	12.1″
Panel	TFT LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,600 px	1,980 px
Resolution (long side)	2,456 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	256 ppi	283 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	600 nits	900 nits
Measured brightness	—	842 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	83.1%	86.8%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T82B	Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Chip maker	Kirin	MediaTek
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	—	8
CPU frequency	2.29 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 920c	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	719,742
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	2,939
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	877
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	10,050 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	14.6 h
Wired charging	40 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	—	33%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	Yes
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
NFC	No	No
GPS	No	Yes
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-22.1 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Sensors	Accelerometer	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	—
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	8 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Harmony OS 4.3	Android 16
Platform	Other (Windows, …)	Android
Interface	—	OxygenOS 16
EU label
Energy class	G	F
Battery charge cycles	1,000	800
Endurance per cycle	80 h	101 h
Repairability class	C	B
Drop resistance class	E	E

Related comparisons

Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)

Lenovo IdeaTab ProvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)

VALE V12XvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)

Xiaomi Poco Pad M1vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) 7.87.5

Doogee Tab E3 MaxvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) 7.67.5

Lenovo IdeaTab ProvsOnePlus Pad Go 2