vs
7.8Display8.8
7.6Battery9.1
5.6Memory & storage4.8
5.1Features6.0
Why is MatePad 11.5 (2025) better than Pad 5?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight515 g vs 577 g+12%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Pad 5 better than MatePad 11.5 (2025)?
- Wired charging40 W vs 67 W+68%
- Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 10,420 mAh+3%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Screen size11.5″ vs 12.1″+5%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Energy classG vs F
- Repairability classC vs B
- Pixel density256 ppi vs 304 ppi+19%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 2,120 px+32%
- Endurance per cycle80 h vs 104 h+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 515 g | 577 g |
| Thickness | 6.1 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 262.6 mm | 6 mm |
| Width | 177.5 mm | 193.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP40 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx0 |
| Colours | Violet, Space Gray | Silver, Gray, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.5″ | 12.1″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 2,120 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,456 px | 3,000 px |
| Pixel density | 256 ppi | 304 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.1% | 86.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T82B | MediaTek Dimensity |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| CPU frequency | 2.29 GHz | — |
| GPU | Maleoon 920c | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 10,420 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 67 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | — |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | — | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Gyroscope, Accelerometer, Compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Harmony OS 4.3 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Other (Windows, …) | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 16 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | 80 h | 104 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
vs
Lenovo IdeaTab ProvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
vs
VALE V12XvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
7.87.5
vs
Doogee Tab E3 MaxvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
7.67.5
vs
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 12.1vsOPPO Pad 5