How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. MatePad 11.5 (2025) vs Poco Pad

Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025) vs Xiaomi Poco Pad

What MatePad 11.5 (2025) does better (5) and where Poco Pad wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Huawei MatePad 11.5 (2025)
Huawei · 2025MatePad 11.5 (2025)
7.5Score
5 advantages≈ $310
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad
Xiaomi · 2024Poco Pad
7.3Score
6 advantages≈ $300
7.7Display7.6
7.6Battery6.0
5.6Memory & storage7.6
5.1Features6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad 11.5 (2025)Poco Pad
177.5 × 262.66.1181.9 × 2807.5
MatePad 11.5 (2025)Poco PadDifference
Height262.6 mm280 mm−17.4 mm
Width177.5 mm181.9 mm−4.4 mm
Thickness6.1 mm7.5 mm−1.4 mm
Weight515 g571 g−56 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad 11.5 (2025) better than Poco Pad?

  1. Wired charging40 W vs 33 W+21%
  2. Weight515 g vs 571 g+11%
  3. Pixel density256 ppi vs 249 ppi+3%
  4. Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
  5. Thickness6.1 mm vs 7.5 mm+23%

Why is Poco Pad better than MatePad 11.5 (2025)?

  1. Screen size11.5″ vs 12.1″+5%
  2. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Memory card slotNo · MatePad 11.5 (2025): Yes
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · MatePad 11.5 (2025): Yes
  5. CPU frequency2.29 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+5%
  6. Resolution (long side)2,456 px vs 2,560 px+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco PadXiaomi Poco Pad≈ $3007.3
Design
Weight515 g571 g
Thickness6.1 mm7.5 mm
Height262.6 mm280 mm
Width177.5 mm181.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursViolet, Space GrayDark Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size11.5″12.1″
PanelTFT LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,600 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)2,456 px2,560 px
Pixel density256 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits600 nits
Measured brightness—564 nits
Screen-to-body ratio83.1%83.4%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetKirin T82BQualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Chip makerKirinQualcomm
Process—4 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency2.29 GHz2.4 GHz
GPUMaleoon 920cAdreno 710
AnTuTu score—600,399
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—2,909
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—793
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity10,100 mAh10,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—9.2 h
Wired charging40 W33 W
Charged in 30 min—29%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5G—Yes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
NFCNoNo
GPSNoNo
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperturef/1.8f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera8 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchHarmony OS 4.3Android 14
PlatformOther (Windows, …)Android
Interface—HyperOS
EU label
Energy classG—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle80 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classE—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare