zh.md
Compare
MatePad 12 X (2025) vs Yoga Tab Plus

Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025) vs Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus

What MatePad 12 X (2025) does better (7) and where Yoga Tab Plus wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2025MatePad 12 X (2025)

8.6Score

7 advantages≈ $750

Lenovo · 2025Yoga Tab Plus

9.1Score

11 advantages≈ $830

Higher score

9.0Display8.9

7.9Performance9.0

8.5Battery8.8

8.1Memory & storage9.1

7.6Features7.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad 12 X (2025)Yoga Tab Plus

	MatePad 12 X (2025)	Yoga Tab Plus	Difference
Height	270 mm	290.9 mm	−20.9 mm
Width	183 mm	188.3 mm	−5.3 mm
Thickness	5.9 mm	8.5 mm	−2.6 mm
Weight	555 g	640 g	−85 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad 12 X (2025) better than Yoga Tab Plus?

Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
Max video4K vs 1080p
Weight555 g vs 640 g+15%
Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 900 nits+11%
Pixel density279 ppi vs 273 ppi+2%
Thickness5.9 mm vs 8.5 mm+44%

Why is Yoga Tab Plus better than MatePad 12 X (2025)?

Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,973 vs 6,888+73%
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Screen size12″ vs 12.7″+6%
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+32%
Energy classG vs F
Repairability classC vs A
Front camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
Endurance per cycle94 h vs 123 h+31%
Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 2,944 px+5%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025)≈ $7508.6	Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus≈ $8309.1
Design
Weight	555 g	640 g
Thickness	5.9 mm	8.5 mm
Height	270 mm	290.9 mm
Width	183 mm	188.3 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Ingress protection	—	IP53
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx3
Colours	White, Greenery	Seashell, Tidal teal
Display
Screen size	12″	12.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	1,840 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	2,944 px
Pixel density	279 ppi	273 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	900 nits
Measured brightness	897 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	86.3%	85.4%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T92B	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	HiSilicon Maleoon 920	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	—	2,333,285
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,973	6,888
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	10,200 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	66 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	38%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.1
USB version	3.1	3.1
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	No	No
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	—	Side / power button
Sensors	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	—
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	8 MP	13 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.3	Android 14
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	G	F
Battery charge cycles	1,000	1,000
Endurance per cycle	94 h	123 h
Repairability class	C	A
Drop resistance class	E	E

Related comparisons

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025) 8.98.6

Zebra ET401 8vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025)

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025) 8.48.6

Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025)vsLenovo Yoga Tab 8.68.6

Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusvsSamsung Galaxy Tab S11 9.18.9

Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusvsOnePlus Pad 3 9.19.4