vs
9.0Display6.7
7.9Performance7.3
8.5Battery2.3
8.1Memory & storage6.1
7.6Features5.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 12 X (2025)Galaxy Tab Active5
| MatePad 12 X (2025) | Galaxy Tab Active5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 270 mm | 213.8 mm | +56.2 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 126.8 mm | +56.2 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 10.1 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Weight | 555 g | 433 g | +122 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 12 X (2025) better than Galaxy Tab Active5?
- Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 5,050 mAh2×
- Screen size12″ vs 8″+50%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy Tab Active5: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Thickness5.9 mm vs 10.1 mm+71%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
Why is Galaxy Tab Active5 better than MatePad 12 X (2025)?
- Cellular (LTE)No · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- 5GNo · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- Weight555 g vs 433 g+28%
- Memory card slotNo · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- eSIMNo · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- GPSNo · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 555 g | 433 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 10.1 mm |
| Height | 270 mm | 213.8 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 126.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | White, Greenery | Green, Tactical Edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 283 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 897 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 68.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T92B | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Exynos |
| Process | — | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 920 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,973 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 5,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Front / Home button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.3 | Android 14 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 94 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | E | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
8.98.6
vs
Zebra ET401 8vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
8.48.6
vs
Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025)vsLenovo Yoga Tab
8.68.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5vsHuawei MatePad SE 11
6.05.7
vs
Blackview Tab 16 ProvsSamsung Galaxy Tab Active5
6.36.0

