vs
9.0Display8.1
7.9Performance7.9
8.5Battery8.0
8.1Memory & storage7.0
7.6Features8.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 12 X (2025)Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
| MatePad 12 X (2025) | Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 270 mm | 300.6 mm | −30.6 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 194.7 mm | −11.7 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 555 g | 664 g | −109 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 12 X (2025) better than Galaxy Tab S10 FE+?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 90 Hz+60%
- Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
- Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,973 vs 3,860+3%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 800 nits+25%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Measured brightness897 nits vs 748 nits+20%
- Weight555 g vs 664 g+20%
- Pixel density279 ppi vs 259 ppi+8%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,800 px+2%
Why is Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ better than MatePad 12 X (2025)?
- Cellular (LTE)No · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- 5GNo · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- Screen size12″ vs 13.1″+9%
- Memory card slotNo · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- eSIMNo · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- GPSNo · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- Energy classG vs F
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 2,0002×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz+16%
- Front camera8 MP vs 12 MP+50%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 41%+8%
- Endurance per cycle94 h vs 99 h+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 555 g | 664 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 270 mm | 300.6 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 194.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | White, Greenery | Silver, Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 13.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 1,800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 2,880 px |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 259 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 897 nits | 748 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 85% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T92B | Exynos 1580 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Exynos |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 920 | Xclipse 540 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,264,130 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,973 | 3,860 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 10,090 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 41% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | Yes |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.3 | Android 15 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 94 h | 99 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
8.98.6
vs
Zebra ET401 8vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
8.48.6
vs
Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025)vsLenovo Yoga Tab
8.68.6
vs
Lenovo Legion Tab G3vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+vsZebra ET401 8