vs
9.0Display9.7
7.9Performance9.7
8.5Battery9.7
8.1Memory & storage9.4
7.6Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 12 X (2025)Pad 7 Ultra
| MatePad 12 X (2025) | Pad 7 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 270 mm | 305.8 mm | −35.8 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 207.5 mm | −24.5 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 5.1 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 555 g | 609 g | −54 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 12 X (2025) better than Pad 7 Ultra?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Weight555 g vs 609 g+10%
Why is Pad 7 Ultra better than MatePad 12 X (2025)?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,973 vs 9,1912.3×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · MatePad 12 X (2025): Yes
- Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+19%
- Wired charging66 W vs 120 W+82%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,600 nits+60%
- Screen size12″ vs 14″+17%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz+48%
- Front camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
- Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 2,136 px+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 555 g | 609 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 5.1 mm |
| Height | 270 mm | 305.8 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 207.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | White, Greenery | Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 14″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 2,136 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 275 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 897 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 92% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T92B | Xring O1 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Xring |
| Process | — | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 920 | Immortalis-G925 MP16 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,963,052 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,973 | 9,191 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 12,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.3 | Android 15 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 94 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | E | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
8.98.6
vs
Zebra ET401 8vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1vsHuawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
8.48.6
vs
Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025)vsLenovo Yoga Tab
8.68.6
vs
Lenovo Legion Tab G3vsXiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 UltravsXiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
9.59.7