vs
8.7Display9.7
6.3Performance7.4
9.0Battery8.5
8.1Memory & storage9.4
4.9Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 12 XMatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)
| MatePad 12 X | MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 270 mm | 271.3 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 182.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 5.5 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 555 g | 508 g | +47 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 12 X better than MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)?
- CPU frequency2.49 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
Why is MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) better than MatePad 12 X?
- AnTuTu score667,930 vs 1,062,643+59%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · MatePad 12 X: Yes
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 2,000 nits2×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Measured brightness686 nits vs 1,045 nits+52%
- Wired charging66 W vs 100 W+52%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,954 vs 4,157+5%
- GPSNo · MatePad 12 X: Yes
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,206 vs 1,389+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 555 g | 508 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 5.5 mm |
| Height | 270 mm | 271.3 mm |
| Width | 183 mm | 182.5 mm |
| Colours | White, Greenery | Black, Green, White, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 12.2″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Double-layer OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 1,840 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 279 ppi | 275 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 2,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 686 nits | 1,045 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 89% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T90A | Kirin T92A |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Kirin |
| Process | — | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.49 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | Maleoon 920 |
| AnTuTu score | 667,930 | 1,062,643 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,954 | 4,157 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,206 | 1,389 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 10,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.4 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Satellite messaging | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -22.6 LUFS | -22.8 LUFS |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.2 | HarmonyOS 4.3 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | HarmonyOS |
Related comparisons
vs
OnePlus Pad 2vsHuawei MatePad 12 X
8.48.2
vs
Apple iPad Air 13 (2024)vsHuawei MatePad 12 X
8.28.2
vs
Blackview Mega 1vsHuawei MatePad 12 X
7.88.2
vs
Doogee T30 MaxvsHuawei MatePad 12 X
8.18.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)
8.99.0
vs
Zebra ET401 8vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)