zh.md
Compare
MatePad 12 X vs Pad 6S Pro 12.4

Huawei MatePad 12 X vs Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4

What MatePad 12 X does better (4) and where Pad 6S Pro 12.4 wins (17) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2024MatePad 12 X

8.2Score

4 advantages≈ $920

Xiaomi · 2024Pad 6S Pro 12.4

9.0Score

17 advantages≈ $760

Higher score

8.7Display9.1

6.3Performance8.5

9.0Battery7.8

8.1Memory & storage9.4

4.9Features8.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad 12 XPad 6S Pro 12.4

	MatePad 12 X	Pad 6S Pro 12.4	Difference
Height	270 mm	278.7 mm	−8.7 mm
Width	183 mm	191.6 mm	−8.6 mm
Thickness	5.9 mm	6.3 mm	−0.4 mm
Weight	555 g	590 g	−35 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad 12 X better than Pad 6S Pro 12.4?

Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 900 nits+11%
Weight555 g vs 590 g+6%
Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.3 mm+7%

Why is Pad 6S Pro 12.4 better than MatePad 12 X?

AnTuTu score667,930 vs 1,539,7622.3×
Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,206 vs 2,9702.5×
Wired charging66 W vs 120 W+82%
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,954 vs 5,268+33%
Rear camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
Front camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
Screen size12″ vs 12.4″+3%
CPU frequency2.49 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+29%
Measured brightness686 nits vs 848 nits+24%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad 12 X≈ $9208.2	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4≈ $7609.0
Design
Weight	555 g	590 g
Thickness	5.9 mm	6.3 mm
Height	270 mm	278.7 mm
Width	183 mm	191.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	White, Greenery	Black, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size	12″	12.4″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	2,032 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	3,048 px
Pixel density	279 ppi	295 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	900 nits
Measured brightness	686 nits	848 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.3%	85.7%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T90A	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.49 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	HiSilicon Maleoon 910	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	667,930	1,539,762
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,954	5,268
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,206	2,970
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	10,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.2 h
Wired charging	66 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	—	135%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	No	No
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.6 LUFS	-20.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	—	Side / power button
Sensors	Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Front camera	8 MP	32 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.2	Android 14
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	3

Related comparisons

OnePlus Pad 2vsHuawei MatePad 12 X 8.48.2

Apple iPad Air 13 (2024)vsHuawei MatePad 12 X 8.28.2

Blackview Mega 1vsHuawei MatePad 12 X 7.88.2

Doogee T30 MaxvsHuawei MatePad 12 X 8.18.2

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+vsXiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 9.09.0