vs
8.8Memory & storage3.3
Why is MatePad 12X 2025 better than ET401 8?
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Screen size12″ vs 8″+50%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
Why is ET401 8 better than MatePad 12X 2025?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
- Weight555 g vs 480 g+16%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 6+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 555 g | 480 g |
| Height | 6 mm | 11 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 8″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Pixel density | 280 ppi | — |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin | Qualcomm Dragonwing |
| Chip maker | HiSilicon | Qualcomm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 94 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | E | — |
