vs
8.6Display8.3
8.3Performance8.5
6.9Battery7.2
7.2Memory & storage7.0
8.0Features9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad AirGalaxy Tab S9
| MatePad Air | Galaxy Tab S9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 261.9 mm | 254.3 mm | +7.6 mm |
| Width | 178.2 mm | 165.8 mm | +12.4 mm |
| Thickness | 6.4 mm | 5.9 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 508 g | 498 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad Air better than Galaxy Tab S9?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Screen size11.5″ vs 11″+5%
- Pixel density291 ppi vs 274 ppi+6%
- Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,600 px+15%
- Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 2,560 px+9%
Why is Galaxy Tab S9 better than MatePad Air?
- OLED panelNo · MatePad Air: Yes
- 5GNo · MatePad Air: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · MatePad Air: Yes
- eSIMNo · MatePad Air: Yes
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+18%
- Wired charging40 W vs 45 W+12%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Front camera8 MP vs 12 MP+50%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
- Thickness6.4 mm vs 5.9 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 508 g | 498 g |
| Thickness | 6.4 mm | 5.9 mm |
| Height | 261.9 mm | 254.3 mm |
| Width | 178.2 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Graphite Black, White | Beige, Graphite |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.5″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 291 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 576 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9% | 83.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 4G | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3.36 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,771,415 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,838 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,917 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,300 mAh | 8,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | — | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | Yes |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 3.1 | Android 13 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei MatePad AirvsOnePlus Pad
8.37.7
vs
Huawei MatePad AirvsLenovo Legion Y700 (2023)
8.38.0
vs
Huawei MatePad AirvsOukitel RT7 5G
8.37.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
4.88.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
8.66.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FEvsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
7.28.6

