zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S9 vs Redmi Pad SE

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE

What Galaxy Tab S9 does better (27) and where Redmi Pad SE wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9

8.6Score

27 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2023Redmi Pad SE

6.1Score

2 advantages≈ $220

8.3Display5.5

8.5Performance3.5

7.2Battery6.9

7.0Memory & storage6.1

9.4Features3.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9Redmi Pad SE

	Galaxy Tab S9	Redmi Pad SE	Difference
Height	254.3 mm	255.5 mm	−1.2 mm
Width	165.8 mm	167.1 mm	−1.3 mm
Thickness	5.9 mm	7.4 mm	−1.5 mm
Weight	498 g	478 g	+20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 better than Redmi Pad SE?

AnTuTu score1,771,415 vs 242,8857.3×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,838 vs 1,2014.9×
Wired charging45 W vs 18 W2.5×
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
OLED panelYes · Redmi Pad SE: No
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Redmi Pad SE: No
5GYes · Redmi Pad SE: No
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
Battery capacity8,400 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+5%
Peak brightness600 nits vs 400 nits+50%
Measured brightness576 nits vs 402 nits+43%
Front camera12 MP vs 5 MP2.4×

Why is Redmi Pad SE better than Galaxy Tab S9?

3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy Tab S9: Yes
Weight498 g vs 478 g+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9≈ $5408.6	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE≈ $2206.1
Design
Weight	498 g	478 g
Thickness	5.9 mm	7.4 mm
Height	254.3 mm	255.5 mm
Width	165.8 mm	167.1 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass	—
Colours	Beige, Graphite	Lavender Purple, Graphite Gray, Mint Green
Display
Screen size	11″	11″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,600 px	1,200 px
Resolution (long side)	2,560 px	1,920 px
Pixel density	274 ppi	207 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	600 nits	400 nits
Measured brightness	576 nits	402 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	83.2%	81.4%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.36 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Adreno 610
AnTuTu score	1,771,415	242,885
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	5,838	1,201
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,917	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	eMMC 5.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	8,400 mAh	8,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.9 h
Wired charging	45 W	18 W
Charged in 30 min	38%	24%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C
USB version	3.2	2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	—
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	—
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-23.2 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	f/2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	12 MP	5 MP
4K front-camera video	Yes	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 6	HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised	4	—