vs
9.7Display8.9
7.4Performance9.0
8.5Battery8.8
9.4Memory & storage9.1
8.2Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)Yoga Tab Plus
| MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) | Yoga Tab Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 271.3 mm | 290.9 mm | −19.6 mm |
| Width | 182.5 mm | 188.3 mm | −5.8 mm |
| Thickness | 5.5 mm | 8.5 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 508 g | 640 g | −132 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) better than Yoga Tab Plus?
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 900 nits2.2×
- Wired charging100 W vs 45 W2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Yoga Tab Plus: No
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Weight508 g vs 640 g+26%
- GPSYes · Yoga Tab Plus: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Yoga Tab Plus: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Thickness5.5 mm vs 8.5 mm+55%
- Screen-to-body ratio89% vs 85.4%+4%
Why is Yoga Tab Plus better than MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)?
- AnTuTu score1,062,643 vs 2,333,2852.2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,157 vs 6,888+66%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+38%
- Screen size12.2″ vs 12.7″+4%
- Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
- Front camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 2,944 px+5%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 508 g | 640 g |
| Thickness | 5.5 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 271.3 mm | 290.9 mm |
| Width | 182.5 mm | 188.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Black, Green, White, Purple | Seashell, Tidal teal |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.2″ | 12.7″ |
| Panel | Double-layer OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 1,840 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 2,944 px |
| Pixel density | 275 ppi | 273 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,045 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89% | 85.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T92A | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 920 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,062,643 | 2,333,285 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,157 | 6,888 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,389 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,100 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | — | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -22.8 LUFS | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side / power button | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.3 | Android 14 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | F |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 123 h |
| Repairability class | — | A |
| Drop resistance class | — | E |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)
8.99.0
vs
Zebra ET401 8vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)
8.49.0
vs
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
9.09.3
vs
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)vsHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
9.09.5
vs
Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusvsSamsung Galaxy Tab S11
9.18.9