zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) vs Poco Pad X1

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1

What MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) does better (15) and where Poco Pad X1 wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2025MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)

9.0Score

15 advantages≈ $920

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad X1

8.4Score

9 advantages

9.7Display8.7

7.4Performance8.0

8.5Battery7.5

9.4Memory & storage7.9

8.2Features7.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)Poco Pad X1

	MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)	Poco Pad X1	Difference
Height	271.3 mm	251.2 mm	+20.1 mm
Width	182.5 mm	173.4 mm	+9.1 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.2 mm	−0.7 mm
Weight	508 g	500 g	+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) better than Poco Pad X1?

RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 800 nits2.5×
Wired charging100 W vs 45 W2.2×
OLED panelYes · Poco Pad X1: No
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 8,850 mAh+14%
Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
Measured brightness1,045 nits vs 721 nits+45%
Screen size12.2″ vs 11.2″+9%
GPSYes · Poco Pad X1: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Poco Pad X1: No
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%

Why is Poco Pad X1 better than MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)?

AnTuTu score1,062,643 vs 1,647,728+55%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,157 vs 5,149+24%
Pixel density275 ppi vs 344 ppi+25%
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+17%
Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 2,136 px+16%
Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 3,200 px+14%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)≈ $9209.0	Xiaomi Poco Pad X18.4
Design
Weight	508 g	500 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.2 mm
Height	271.3 mm	251.2 mm
Width	182.5 mm	173.4 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Colours	Black, Green, White, Purple	Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size	12.2″	11.2″
Panel	Double-layer OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	2,136 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	275 ppi	344 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	800 nits
Measured brightness	1,045 nits	721 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89%	85.8%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T92A	Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	7 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 920	Adreno 732
AnTuTu score	1,062,643	1,647,728
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,157	5,149
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,389	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	8,850 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.4 h	—
Wired charging	100 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	64%	50%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	—	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.8 LUFS	—
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2.2
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Front camera	8 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.3	Android 15
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised	—	4