vs
9.7Display9.7
9.2Battery8.2
9.1Memory & storage9.6
8.8Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad Pro 12 (2026)MatePad Pro Max
| MatePad Pro 12 (2026) | MatePad Pro Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 264.2 mm | 289.3 mm | −25.1 mm |
| Width | 172.9 mm | 196.3 mm | −23.4 mm |
| Thickness | 4.7 mm | 4.7 mm | = |
| Weight | 439 g | 499 g | −60 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad Pro 12 (2026) better than MatePad Pro Max?
- Weight439 g vs 499 g+14%
- Pixel density296 ppi vs 273 ppi+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio95.6% vs 91.4%+5%
Why is MatePad Pro Max better than MatePad Pro 12 (2026)?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- RAM16 GB vs 20 GB+25%
- Screen size12.2″ vs 13.2″+8%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Resolution (short side)1,952 px vs 2,000 px+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 439 g | 499 g |
| Thickness | 4.7 mm | 4.7 mm |
| Height | 264.2 mm | 289.3 mm |
| Width | 172.9 mm | 196.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, White, Blue, Gold | Blue, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.2″ | 13.2″ |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,952 px | 2,000 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 3,036 px | 3,000 px |
| Pixel density | 296 ppi | 273 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 95.6% | 91.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T93 / Kirin T93A | Kirin T93 Pro |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Kirin |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 20 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,400 mAh | 10,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 57% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 6 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | — | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side / power button | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 6.1 | Harmony OS 4.3 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Other (Windows, …) |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | G |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 72 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | E |
Related comparisons
vs
Honor MagicPad 4vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)
vs
Lenovo Legion Tab G5vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)
vs
Huawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)vsRedmagic Astra 2 Gaming
vs
Honor MagicPad4vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)
9.69.5
vs
Vivo iQOO Pad UltravsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)
9.49.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S12vsHuawei MatePad Pro Max
9.29.4