vs
9.7Display9.2
9.2Battery7.9
9.1Memory & storage9.4
8.8Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad Pro 12 (2026)iQOO Pad Ultra
| MatePad Pro 12 (2026) | iQOO Pad Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 264.2 mm | 197.4 mm | +66.8 mm |
| Width | 172.9 mm | 126.3 mm | +46.6 mm |
| Thickness | 4.7 mm | 5.7 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 439 g | 298 g | +141 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad Pro 12 (2026) better than iQOO Pad Ultra?
- Battery capacity10,400 mAh vs 9,020 mAh+15%
- Screen size12.2″ vs 8.8″+39%
- Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- GPSYes · iQOO Pad Ultra: No
- Front camera12 MP vs 8 MP+50%
- Resolution (short side)1,952 px vs 1,440 px+36%
- Resolution (long side)3,036 px vs 2,304 px+32%
- Thickness4.7 mm vs 5.7 mm+21%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio95.6% vs 90.1%+6%
Why is iQOO Pad Ultra better than MatePad Pro 12 (2026)?
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 4,500 nits2.8×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- Weight439 g vs 298 g+47%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Pixel density296 ppi vs 309 ppi+4%
- USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 439 g | 298 g |
| Thickness | 4.7 mm | 5.7 mm |
| Height | 264.2 mm | 197.4 mm |
| Width | 172.9 mm | 126.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black, Silver, White, Blue, Gold | Black, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.2″ | 8.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,952 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 3,036 px | 2,304 px |
| Pixel density | 296 ppi | 309 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 95.6% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin T93 / Kirin T93A | Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 2 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 5.01 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 850 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 4,518,403 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 11,703 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,400 mAh | 9,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 57% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | — | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side / power button | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 6.1 | Android 17 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | OriginOS 7 HD |
Related comparisons
vs
Honor MagicPad 4vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)
vs
Lenovo Legion Tab G5vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)
vs
Huawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)vsRedmagic Astra 2 Gaming
vs
Honor MagicPad4vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)
9.69.5
vs
Lenovo Legion Tab G5vsVivo iQOO Pad Ultra
vs
Vivo iQOO Pad UltravsRedmagic Astra 2 Gaming