zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 12 (2026) vs Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2

Huawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026) vs Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2

What MatePad Pro 12 (2026) does better (9) and where Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2 wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2026MatePad Pro 12 (2026)

9.4Score

9 advantages≈ $830

Lenovo · 2026Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2

9.7Score

11 advantages≈ $920

Higher score

9.7Display9.5

8.6Battery9.6

9.1Memory & storage9.7

8.8Features8.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 12 (2026)Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2

	MatePad Pro 12 (2026)	Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2	Difference
Height	264.2 mm	291.8 mm	−27.6 mm
Width	172.9 mm	200.4 mm	−27.5 mm
Thickness	4.7 mm	6.1 mm	−1.4 mm
Weight	439 g	605 g	−166 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 12 (2026) better than Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2?

OLED panelYes · Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2: No
Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 1,100 nits+45%
Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
Weight439 g vs 605 g+38%
GPSYes · Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2: No
Front camera12 MP vs 8 MP+50%
Charged in 30 min57% vs 40%+43%
Thickness4.7 mm vs 6.1 mm+30%
Screen-to-body ratio95.6% vs 86.1%+11%

Why is Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2 better than MatePad Pro 12 (2026)?

Battery capacity10,400 mAh vs 12,700 mAh+22%
Screen size12.2″ vs 13″+7%
Memory card slotNo · MatePad Pro 12 (2026): Yes
Energy classG vs E
Repairability classC vs A
Pixel density296 ppi vs 355 ppi+20%
Endurance per cycle87 h vs 160 h+83%
Wired charging66 W vs 68 W+3%
Resolution (short side)1,952 px vs 2,560 px+31%
Resolution (long side)3,036 px vs 3,840 px+26%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)≈ $8309.4	Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2≈ $9209.7
Design
Weight	439 g	605 g
Thickness	4.7 mm	6.1 mm
Height	264.2 mm	291.8 mm
Width	172.9 mm	200.4 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP42	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Colours	Black, Silver, White, Blue, Gold	Cosmic Blue
Display
Screen size	12.2″	13″
Panel	OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,952 px	2,560 px
Resolution (long side)	3,036 px	3,840 px
Pixel density	296 ppi	355 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,600 nits	1,100 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	95.6%	86.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T93 / Kirin T93A	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	—	4.32 GHz
GPU	—	Adreno 830
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,400 mAh	12,700 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Wired charging	66 W	68 W
Charged in 30 min	57%	40%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	6	6
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	—
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	—
Front camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 6.1	Android 17
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	G	E
Battery charge cycles	1,000	1,000
Endurance per cycle	87 h	160 h
Repairability class	C	A
Drop resistance class	E	E

Related comparisons

Honor MagicPad 4vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)

Lenovo Legion Tab G5vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)

Huawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)vsRedmagic Astra 2 Gaming

Honor MagicPad4vsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026) 9.69.4

Vivo iQOO Pad UltravsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026) 9.49.4