zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) vs Pad 3 Pro

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) vs OPPO Pad 3 Pro

What MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) does better (12) and where Pad 3 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2024MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)

9.5Score

12 advantages≈ $730

Higher score

OPPO · 2024Pad 3 Pro

9.0Score

6 advantages≈ $650

9.7Display9.0

9.2Battery8.2

9.4Memory & storage9.4

9.2Features7.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)Pad 3 Pro

	MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)	Pad 3 Pro	Difference
Height	289.1 mm	268.7 mm	+20.4 mm
Width	196.1 mm	195.1 mm	+1 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.5 mm	−1 mm
Weight	580 g	586 g	−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) better than Pad 3 Pro?

OLED panelYes · Pad 3 Pro: No
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 3 Pro: No
Battery capacity10,100 mAh vs 9,510 mAh+6%
Wired charging100 W vs 67 W+49%
Rear camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
Screen size13.2″ vs 12.1″+9%
GPSYes · Pad 3 Pro: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pad 3 Pro: No
Front camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 900 nits+11%
Thickness5.5 mm vs 6.5 mm+18%
Screen-to-body ratio91.5% vs 84.9%+8%

Why is Pad 3 Pro better than MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)?

Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Pixel density262 ppi vs 304 ppi+16%
Resolution (short side)1,920 px vs 2,120 px+10%
Resolution (long side)2,880 px vs 3,000 px+4%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)≈ $7309.5	OPPO Pad 3 Pro≈ $6509.0
Design
Weight	580 g	586 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.5 mm
Height	289.1 mm	268.7 mm
Width	196.1 mm	195.1 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	Fibre	Aluminium
Colours	Black, White, Gold	Blue, Gold
Display
Screen size	13.2″	12.1″
Panel	OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,920 px	2,120 px
Resolution (long side)	2,880 px	3,000 px
Pixel density	262 ppi	304 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	900 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	91.5%	84.9%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T92	Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	—	3.39 GHz
GPU	—	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	—	2,333,285
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,500
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,700
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	9,510 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	100 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	—	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	—
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2.2
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Front camera	16 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Harmony OS 4.3	Android 14
Platform	Other (Windows, …)	Android
Interface	—	ColorOS 14.1

Related comparisons

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4vsHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 9.09.5

Honor MagicPad 2 12.3vsHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 8.89.5

Xiaomi Pad 7 UltravsHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 9.79.5

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)vsHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 9.09.5

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4vsOPPO Pad 3 Pro 9.09.0