zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) vs Pad 6S Pro 12.4

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) vs Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4

What MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) does better (8) and where Pad 6S Pro 12.4 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2024MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)

9.5Score

8 advantages≈ $730

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Pad 6S Pro 12.4

9.0Score

7 advantages≈ $760

9.7Display9.1

9.2Battery7.8

9.4Memory & storage9.4

9.2Features8.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)Pad 6S Pro 12.4

	MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)	Pad 6S Pro 12.4	Difference
Height	289.1 mm	278.7 mm	+10.4 mm
Width	196.1 mm	191.6 mm	+4.5 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.3 mm	−0.8 mm
Weight	580 g	590 g	−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) better than Pad 6S Pro 12.4?

OLED panelYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Screen size13.2″ vs 12.4″+6%
GPSYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pad 6S Pro 12.4: No
Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 900 nits+11%
Thickness5.5 mm vs 6.3 mm+15%
Screen-to-body ratio91.5% vs 85.7%+7%

Why is Pad 6S Pro 12.4 better than MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)?

Front camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Pixel density262 ppi vs 295 ppi+13%
Resolution (short side)1,920 px vs 2,032 px+6%
Resolution (long side)2,880 px vs 3,048 px+6%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)≈ $7309.5	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4≈ $7609.0
Design
Weight	580 g	590 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.3 mm
Height	289.1 mm	278.7 mm
Width	196.1 mm	191.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	Fibre	Aluminium
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Black, White, Gold	Black, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size	13.2″	12.4″
Panel	OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,920 px	2,032 px
Resolution (long side)	2,880 px	3,048 px
Pixel density	262 ppi	295 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	900 nits
Measured brightness	—	848 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	91.5%	85.7%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin T92	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	—	3.2 GHz
GPU	—	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	—	1,539,762
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	5,268
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	2,970
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	10,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.2 h
Wired charging	100 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	—	135%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	—	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	—
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-20.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Side / power button
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	50 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Front camera	16 MP	32 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Harmony OS 4.3	Android 14
Platform	Other (Windows, …)	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	3

Related comparisons

Honor MagicPad 2 12.3vsHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 8.89.5

Xiaomi Pad 7 UltravsHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 9.79.5

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)vsHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 9.09.5

OPPO Pad 3 ProvsHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 9.09.5

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+vsXiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 9.09.0