How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
630 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. IS945.1 vs Pad 90

i.safe MOBILE IS945.1 vs OSCAL Pad 90

What IS945.1 does better (1) and where Pad 90 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

i.safe MOBILE IS945.1
i.safe MOBILE · 2025IS945.1
1 advantage≈ $4,400
vs
OSCAL Pad 90
OSCAL · 2025Pad 90
5.8Score
3 advantages
Higher score
4.9Memory & storage5.2

Why is IS945.1 better than Pad 90?

  1. eSIMYes · Pad 90: No

Why is Pad 90 better than IS945.1?

  1. Cellular (LTE)No · IS945.1: Yes
  2. Weight1,059 g vs 534 g+98%
  3. Screen size10.1″ vs 10.9″+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight1,059 g534 g
Thickness—8 mm
Height20 mm258.1 mm
Width—169.6 mm
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass 3—
Colours—Space Gray, Sky Blue
Display
Screen size10.1″10.9″
Panel—IPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)—800 px
Resolution (long side)—1,280 px
Pixel density—138 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Peak brightness—350 nits
Screen-to-body ratio—79%
Performance
ChipsetQualcommUnisoc T606
Chip makerQualcommUnisoc
Process—12 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—1.6 GHz
GPU—Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.1
Memory card slot—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity—7,700 mAh
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoYes
5G—No
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.2—
USB—USB Type-C
NFC—No
GPS—Yes
Satellite navigation—GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—No
Cameras
Rear camera—13 MP
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Max video—1080p
Front camera—8 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launch—Android 14
Platform—Android
Interface—DokeOS 4.0
EU label
Energy class—D
Battery charge cycles—800
Endurance per cycle—125 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare