vs
4.6Display6.8
5.4Performance4.9
3.7Battery4.3
6.1Memory & storage5.2
4.7Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Xpad 30EMoto Pad (2026)
| Xpad 30E | Moto Pad (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 257.7 mm | 254.6 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Width | 169.2 mm | 166.2 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 498 g | 480 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Xpad 30E better than Moto Pad (2026)?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Battery capacity7,200 mAh vs 7,040 mAh+2%
Why is Moto Pad (2026) better than Xpad 30E?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Wired charging10 W vs 20 W2×
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 274 ppi+33%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
- Peak brightness440 nits vs 500 nits+14%
- Weight498 g vs 480 g+4%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 1,600 px+33%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 2,560 px+33%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 7 mm+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio80.5% vs 82.9%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 498 g | 480 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7 mm |
| Height | 257.7 mm | 254.6 mm |
| Width | 169.2 mm | 166.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Deep Blue, Dreamy Purple, Forest Green | Pantone Bronze Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 440 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 392 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.5% | 82.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 527,271 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,981 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,200 mAh | 7,040 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 20 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsInfinix Xpad 30E
5.85.7
vs
Acer Iconia A16 A16-21vsInfinix Xpad 30E
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsInfinix Xpad 30E
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsInfinix Xpad 30E
5.45.7
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
5.86.0
vs
Motorola Moto Pad (2026)vsAcer Iconia A16 A16-21