vs
4.6Display5.2
5.4Performance4.8
3.7Battery7.5
6.1Memory & storage6.1
4.7Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Xpad 30ERugKing Pad 2 Pro
| Xpad 30E | RugKing Pad 2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 257.7 mm | 246 mm | +11.7 mm |
| Width | 169.2 mm | 163.5 mm | +5.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 12.7 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Weight | 498 g | 706 g | −208 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Xpad 30E better than RugKing Pad 2 Pro?
- Stereo speakersYes · RugKing Pad 2 Pro: No
- Screen size11″ vs 10.1″+9%
- Weight498 g vs 706 g+42%
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 149 ppi+38%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+11%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 12.7 mm+61%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,280 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio80.5% vs 73.5%+10%
Why is RugKing Pad 2 Pro better than Xpad 30E?
- Battery capacity7,200 mAh vs 10,200 mAh+42%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Wired charging10 W vs 18 W+80%
- Rear camera8 MP vs 48 MP6×
- Peak brightness440 nits vs 600 nits+36%
- eSIMNo · Xpad 30E: Yes
- Front camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 498 g | 706 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 12.7 mm |
| Height | 257.7 mm | 246 mm |
| Width | 169.2 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Deep Blue, Dreamy Purple, Forest Green | Gray, Black, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 440 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.5% | 73.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,200 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 48 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | E |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 126 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsInfinix Xpad 30E
5.85.7
vs
Acer Iconia A16 A16-21vsInfinix Xpad 30E
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsInfinix Xpad 30E
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsInfinix Xpad 30E
5.45.7
vs
UleFone RugKing Pad 2 ProvsAcer Iconia A16 A16-21
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsUleFone RugKing Pad 2 Pro