How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Xpad GT vs Moto Pad 70 Pro

Infinix Xpad GT vs Motorola Moto Pad 70 Pro

What Xpad GT does better (4) and where Moto Pad 70 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Infinix Xpad GT
Infinix · 2025Xpad GT
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ $380
vs
Motorola Moto Pad 70 Pro
Motorola · 2026Moto Pad 70 Pro
8.8Score
12 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
8.4Display9.1
7.9Performance8.1
7.4Battery9.4
6.8Memory & storage6.1
5.9Features6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Xpad GTMoto Pad 70 Pro
191.1 × 291.76.5191.9 × 296.56.2
Xpad GTMoto Pad 70 ProDifference
Height291.7 mm296.5 mm−4.8 mm
Width191.1 mm191.9 mm−0.8 mm
Thickness6.5 mm6.2 mm+0.3 mm
Weight655 g598 g+57 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Xpad GT better than Moto Pad 70 Pro?

  1. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  2. GPSYes · Moto Pad 70 Pro: No
  3. Front camera9 MP vs 8 MP+12%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio88.7% vs 86.1%+3%

Why is Moto Pad 70 Pro better than Xpad GT?

  1. Wired charging33 W vs 68 W2.1×
  2. Pixel density263 ppi vs 318 ppi+21%
  3. Memory card slotNo · Xpad GT: Yes
  4. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
  5. Peak brightness700 nits vs 800 nits+14%
  6. CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+13%
  7. Weight655 g vs 598 g+10%
  8. Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
  9. Resolution (long side)2,880 px vs 3,504 px+22%
  10. Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 2,190 px+19%
  11. Bluetooth5.3 vs 6+13%
  12. Thickness6.5 mm vs 6.2 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Infinix Xpad GTInfinix Xpad GT≈ $3808.0
Design
Weight655 g598 g
Thickness6.5 mm6.2 mm
Height291.7 mm296.5 mm
Width191.1 mm191.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
Ingress protection—IP52
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx2
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3—
ColoursStellar GrayPantone Titan
Display
Screen size13″13″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,840 px2,190 px
Resolution (long side)2,880 px3,504 px
Pixel density263 ppi318 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness700 nits800 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.7%86.1%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5GQualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process5 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.84 GHz3.21 GHz
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 825
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity10,000 mAh10,200 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)11.4 h—
Wired charging33 W68 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.36
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)—Yes
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-20.7 LUFS—
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2—
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p—
Front camera9 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceXOS 15—
Major OS updates promised—2
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare