How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. DuraSlate vs Pad 6

Kyocera DuraSlate vs Xiaomi Pad 6

What DuraSlate does better (3) and where Pad 6 wins (18) — every spec side by side.

Kyocera DuraSlate
Kyocera · 2023DuraSlate
4.9Score
3 advantages≈ $390
vs
Xiaomi Pad 6
Xiaomi · 2023Pad 6
7.2Score
18 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
4.2Display7.8
4.4Performance6.9
5.1Battery6.1
2.3Memory & storage5.6
3.4Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

DuraSlatePad 6
168 × 2598.6165.2 × 2546.5
DuraSlatePad 6Difference
Height259 mm254 mm+5 mm
Width168 mm165.2 mm+2.8 mm
Thickness8.6 mm6.5 mm+2.1 mm
Weight488 g490 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is DuraSlate better than Pad 6?

  1. Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
  2. Memory card slotYes · Pad 6: No
  3. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Pad 6: No

Why is Pad 6 better than DuraSlate?

  1. RAM3 GB vs 8 GB2.7×
  2. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
  3. Storage (max)32 GB vs 256 GB8×
  4. Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 8,840 mAh+26%
  5. Storage (base)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
  6. Screen size10.1″ vs 11″+9%
  7. Pixel density224 ppi vs 309 ppi+38%
  8. CPU frequency2.35 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+36%
  9. Max video1080p vs 4K
  10. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
  11. Process12 nm vs 7 nm+71%
  12. Rear camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Pad 6Xiaomi Pad 6≈ $4307.2
Design
Weight488 g490 g
Thickness8.6 mm6.5 mm
Height259 mm254 mm
Width168 mm165.2 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionDragontrail Pro GlassCorning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursBlackBlack, Blue, Gold
Display
Screen size10.1″11″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px1,800 px
Resolution (long side)1,920 px2,880 px
Pixel density224 ppi309 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness—550 nits
Measured brightness—500 nits
Screen-to-body ratio68%83.6%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek MT6765 Helio P35Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process12 nm7 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.35 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 650
AnTuTu score—1,005,598
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—3,506
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,147
Memory
RAM3 GB8 GB
Storage (max)32 GB256 GB
Storage (base)32 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity7,000 mAh8,840 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Po
Active use (test)—9.7 h
Wired charging45 W33 W
Charged in 30 min—38%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.15.2
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)—Yes
NFCNoNo
GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS—
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.7 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera8 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2.4f/2.2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p4K
4K video frame rate—30 fps
Front camera5 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 12Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—MIUI Pad 14
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare