How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Idea Tab Plus vs Poco Pad M1

Lenovo Idea Tab Plus vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

What Idea Tab Plus does better (14) and where Poco Pad M1 wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Lenovo Idea Tab Plus
Lenovo · 2025Idea Tab Plus
7.7Score
14 advantages≈ $320
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad M1
7.8Score
10 advantages
Higher score
7.9Display7.6
5.6Performance5.7
8.6Battery9.1
7.0Memory & storage7.6
5.6Features5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Idea Tab PlusPoco Pad M1
181.1 × 278.86.3181.7 × 279.87.5
Idea Tab PlusPoco Pad M1Difference
Height278.8 mm279.8 mm−1 mm
Width181.1 mm181.7 mm−0.6 mm
Thickness6.3 mm7.5 mm−1.2 mm
Weight530 g610 g−80 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Idea Tab Plus better than Poco Pad M1?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,021 vs 1,244+62%
  2. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  3. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Poco Pad M1: No
  4. 5GYes · Poco Pad M1: No
  5. Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
  6. Peak brightness800 nits vs 600 nits+33%
  7. GPSYes · Poco Pad M1: No
  8. Energy classF vs G
  9. Repairability classA vs C
  10. Weight530 g vs 610 g+15%
  11. Measured brightness618 nits vs 581 nits+6%
  12. Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%

Why is Poco Pad M1 better than Idea Tab Plus?

  1. AnTuTu score519,771 vs 817,549+57%
  2. Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+18%
  3. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  4. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Idea Tab Plus: Yes
  6. Drop resistance classE vs A
  7. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
  8. CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+8%
  9. Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
  10. Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight530 g610 g
Thickness6.3 mm7.5 mm
Height278.8 mm279.8 mm
Width181.1 mm181.7 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
Ingress protectionIP52—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2—
ColoursCloud grey, Luna grey, Sand roseGray, Blue
Display
Screen size12.1″12.1″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,600 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)2,560 px2,560 px
Pixel density249 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness800 nits600 nits
Measured brightness618 nits581 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%83.5%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6400Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.5 GHz2.7 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 810
AnTuTu score519,771817,549
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,0211,244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,103
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity10,200 mAh12,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Po
Active use (test)—14.8 h
Wired charging45 W33 W
Charged in 30 min38%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GYesNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.4
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)Yes—
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO—
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity (accessories only)Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera8 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceZen UI 17HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised2—
EU label
Energy classFG
Battery charge cycles1,0001,000
Endurance per cycle108 h103 h
Repairability classAC
Drop resistance classEA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare