How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Idea Tab Pro vs Poco Pad M1

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

What Idea Tab Pro does better (19) and where Poco Pad M1 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Lenovo · 2025Idea Tab Pro
8.3Score
19 advantages≈ $420
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
Xiaomi · 2025Poco Pad M1
7.8Score
6 advantages
7.2Display7.6
8.2Performance5.7
8.7Battery9.1
7.0Memory & storage7.6
5.8Features5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Idea Tab ProPoco Pad M1
189.1 × 291.86.9181.7 × 279.87.5
Idea Tab ProPoco Pad M1Difference
Height291.8 mm279.8 mm+12 mm
Width189.1 mm181.7 mm+7.4 mm
Thickness6.9 mm7.5 mm−0.6 mm
Weight620 g610 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Idea Tab Pro better than Poco Pad M1?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,438 vs 1,2443.6×
  2. AnTuTu score1,604,810 vs 817,549+96%
  3. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  4. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  5. Screen size12.7″ vs 12.1″+5%
  6. Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
  7. CPU frequency3.35 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+24%
  8. GPSYes · Poco Pad M1: No
  9. Max video4K vs 1080p
  10. Energy classF vs G
  11. Repairability classA vs C
  12. Pixel density273 ppi vs 249 ppi+10%

Why is Poco Pad M1 better than Idea Tab Pro?

  1. Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+18%
  2. Measured brightness384 nits vs 581 nits+51%
  3. Peak brightness400 nits vs 600 nits+50%
  4. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Idea Tab Pro: Yes
  6. Drop resistance classE vs A
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight620 g610 g
Thickness6.9 mm7.5 mm
Height291.8 mm279.8 mm
Width189.1 mm181.7 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protectionIP52—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2—
ColoursLuna grey, GreenGray, Blue
Display
Screen size12.7″12.1″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,840 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)2,944 px2,560 px
Pixel density273 ppi249 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness400 nits600 nits
Measured brightness384 nits581 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.8%83.5%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8300Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.35 GHz2.7 GHz
GPUMali G615-MC6Adreno 810
AnTuTu score1,604,810817,549
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,4381,244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,103
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity10,200 mAh12,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—14.8 h
Wired charging45 W33 W
Charged in 30 min30%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.4
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)Yes—
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO—
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Fingerprint sensorSide / power button—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compassAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP8 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2.4f/2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate30 fps—
Front camera8 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised2—
EU label
Energy classFG
Battery charge cycles1,0001,000
Endurance per cycle113 h103 h
Repairability classAC
Drop resistance classEA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare