zh.md
Compare
Yoga Tab Plus vs Pad 6S Pro 12.4

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus vs Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4

What Yoga Tab Plus does better (4) and where Pad 6S Pro 12.4 wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Lenovo · 2025Yoga Tab Plus

9.1Score

4 advantages≈ $830

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Pad 6S Pro 12.4

9.0Score

11 advantages≈ $760

8.9Display9.1

9.0Performance8.5

8.8Battery7.8

9.1Memory & storage9.4

7.1Features8.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

Yoga Tab PlusPad 6S Pro 12.4

	Yoga Tab Plus	Pad 6S Pro 12.4	Difference
Height	290.9 mm	278.7 mm	+12.2 mm
Width	188.3 mm	191.6 mm	−3.3 mm
Thickness	8.5 mm	6.3 mm	+2.2 mm
Weight	640 g	590 g	+50 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Yoga Tab Plus better than Pad 6S Pro 12.4?

AnTuTu score2,333,285 vs 1,539,762+52%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,888 vs 5,268+31%
Screen size12.7″ vs 12.4″+2%
CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%

Why is Pad 6S Pro 12.4 better than Yoga Tab Plus?

Wired charging45 W vs 120 W2.7×
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Rear camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
Front camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
Max video1080p vs 4K
Weight640 g vs 590 g+8%
Pixel density273 ppi vs 295 ppi+8%
Thickness8.5 mm vs 6.3 mm+35%
Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 2,032 px+10%
Resolution (long side)2,944 px vs 3,048 px+4%
USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus≈ $8309.1	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4≈ $7609.0
Design
Weight	640 g	590 g
Thickness	8.5 mm	6.3 mm
Height	290.9 mm	278.7 mm
Width	188.3 mm	191.6 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP53	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx3	—
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Seashell, Tidal teal	Black, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size	12.7″	12.4″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	2,032 px
Resolution (long side)	2,944 px	3,048 px
Pixel density	273 ppi	295 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	900 nits	900 nits
Measured brightness	—	848 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	85.4%	85.7%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	2,333,285	1,539,762
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,888	5,268
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	2,970
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,200 mAh	10,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.2 h
Wired charging	45 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	—	135%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	No
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	No	No
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-20.5 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Side / power button
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	60 fps
Front camera	13 MP	32 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	3	3
EU label
Energy class	F	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	123 h	—
Repairability class	A	—
Drop resistance class	E	—

Related comparisons

Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusvsSamsung Galaxy Tab S11 9.18.9

Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusvsOnePlus Pad 3 9.19.4

Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusvsZebra ET401 8

Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusvsHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) 9.19.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+vsXiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 9.09.0