vs
6.8Display6.8
4.9Performance5.9
4.3Battery5.9
5.2Memory & storage4.6
5.9Features3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto Pad (2026)Tab A1 NxtPaper
| Moto Pad (2026) | Tab A1 NxtPaper | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254.6 mm | 251.3 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 163.2 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 6.2 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 480 g | 426 g | +54 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto Pad (2026) better than Tab A1 NxtPaper?
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Tab A1 NxtPaper: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density274 ppi vs 226 ppi+21%
- GPSYes · Tab A1 NxtPaper: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Tab A1 NxtPaper: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 1,320 px+21%
- Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 2,112 px+21%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Tab A1 NxtPaper better than Moto Pad (2026)?
- Battery capacity7,040 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+14%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- Weight480 g vs 426 g+13%
- Thickness7 mm vs 6.2 mm+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.9% vs 85.5%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 426 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 6.2 mm |
| Height | 254.6 mm | 251.3 mm |
| Width | 166.2 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Pantone Bronze Green | Aerolite Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 1,320 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 2,112 px |
| Pixel density | 274 ppi | 226 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 392 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 85.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 527,271 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,981 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,040 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 20 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
5.86.0
vs
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
vs
TCL Tab A1vsMotorola Moto Pad (2026)
6.16.0
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsTCL Tab A1 NxtPaper
5.86.0
vs

